Treatment-Free Interval: A Novel Approach to Assessing Real-World Treatment Effectiveness and Economic Impact Among Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.

INTRODUCTION: Objective assessment of treatment effectiveness using real-world claims data is challenging. This study assessed treatment-free intervals (TFI) as a proxy for treatment effectiveness, and all-cause healthcare costs among adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) treated with rifaximin or eluxadoline in the USA. METHODS: Adult patients (18-64 years) with IBS-D and ≥ 1 rifaximin or eluxadoline prescription were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (10/01/2015-12/31/2021) and classified into two mutually exclusive cohorts (i.e., rifaximin and eluxadoline). Index date was the date of rifaximin or eluxadoline initiation. Entropy-balanced baseline characteristics, TFI (periods of ≥ 30 consecutive days without IBS-D treatment), and healthcare costs were reported. Healthcare costs were compared between cohorts using mean cost differences. RESULTS: There were 7094 and 2161 patients in the rifaximin and eluxadoline cohorts, respectively. After balancing, baseline characteristics (mean age 44.1 years; female 72.4%) were similar between cohorts. A higher proportion of patients treated with rifaximin achieved a TFI of ≥ 30 days (76.2% vs. 66.7%), ≥ 60 days (67.0% vs. 47.0%), ≥ 90 days (61.0% vs. 38.7%), ≥ 180 days (51.7% vs. 31.0%), and ≥ 240 days (47.7% vs. 27.9%) compared to eluxadoline. Among patients with a TFI ≥ 30 days, mean TFI durations were 8.3 and 6.0 months for the rifaximin and eluxadoline cohorts. Mean all-cause healthcare costs were lower for rifaximin vs. eluxadoline ($18,316 vs. $23,437; p = 0.008), primarily driven by pharmacy costs ($7348 vs. $10,250; p < 0.001). In a simulated health plan of one million commercially insured lives, initiating 50% of patients on rifaximin instead of eluxadoline resulted in total cost savings of $2.1 million per year or $0.18 per-member-per-month. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study suggests that TFI is a meaningful surrogate measure of treatment effectiveness in IBS-D. Patients treated with rifaximin had longer treatment-free periods and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with eluxadoline.

Prokinetics-safety and efficacy: The European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility/The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society expert review.

BACKGROUND: Prokinetics are a class of pharmacological drugs designed to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility, either regionally or across the whole gut. Each drug has its merits and drawbacks, and based on current evidence as high-quality studies are limited, we have no clear recommendation on one class or other. However, there remains a large unmet need for both regionally selective and/or globally acting prokinetic drugs that work primarily intraluminally and are safe and without systemic side effects. PURPOSE: Here, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of six classes of prokinetic drugs, including their pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, safety and tolerability and potential indications.

Prevalence and patterns of laxative use in subjects with self-reported constipation: results from a multinational digestive health survey.

Background: Constipation is characterized by symptoms of straining, hard stool, difficult evacuation, and infrequent bowel movements. Online surveys provide valuable information about patients' perspectives, symptoms, management, treatment satisfaction, and risk factors. Methods: This survey explored subject experiences involving 20 gastrointestinal (GI) conditions. In total, 20,099 respondents in seven countries with varied cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds participated. Post hoc analysis of 'self-reported constipation' and related symptoms experienced within the past 6 months and the last episode of constipation provided data on prevalence, demographics, frequency and duration of episodes and related symptoms, impact on quality of life (QoL), management with or without laxatives, and resulting treatment satisfaction. Results: In total, 10,425 subjects reported constipation within 6 months and 2637 at the last episode. Prevalence was highest in females and younger adults. Most subjects reported various coexisting GI symptoms. Almost 80% of 6865 episodes reported by 5337 subjects occurred every 2-3 months to every 2-3 weeks. A higher frequency of constipation correlated with a greater impact on QoL. On a 10-point scale, the mean impact was 6.4. More than 90% of respondents had episodes ranging from 1 day to 1 week. More than 90% took action; 16% used laxatives, of whom 80.3% were satisfied. Conclusion: Constipation, a highly prevalent disorder, spans cultures and socioeconomic classes. Its chronic recurrence has a significant impact on QoL, resulting in symptom self-management in >90% of subjects. Significantly higher satisfaction rates in subjects treated with than without laxatives reflect subjects' reports that self-reported constipation can be treated effectively with laxatives.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.

Disorders of gut-brain interaction are characterized by chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of abnormal endoscopic or radiologic findings or objective biomarkers that can be identified during routine clinical evaluation. The assessment of the symptom pattern and severity, therefore, is the key modality to evaluate the presence, impact, and evolution of these conditions, for both clinical and regulatory purposes. Patient-reported outcomes are structured symptom assessment questionnaires designed to evaluate symptom patterns, quantify severity of symptoms, and evaluate response to treatment at follow-up. This review provides an overview of currently available patient-reported outcomes for evaluating the main disorders of gut-brain interaction, specifically, functional dyspepsia; irritable bowel syndrome; and chronic constipation. It summarizes their content, level of validation for clinical practice and for research, and the regulatory approach to these conditions. Expected future developments and need for further research on patient-reported outcomes for these and other disorders of gut-brain interaction are highlighted.

Abdominal Symptom Improvement During Clinical Trials of Tenapanor in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Post Hoc Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of tenapanor on abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Abdominal symptoms assessed included pain, discomfort, bloating, cramping, and fullness. METHODS: The abdominal symptom data were pooled from 3 randomized controlled trials (NCT01923428, T3MPO-1 [NCT02621892], and T3MPO-2 [NCT02686138]). Weekly scores were calculated for each abdominal symptom, and the Abdominal Score (AS) was derived as the average of weekly scores for abdominal pain, discomfort, and bloating. The overall change from baseline during the 12 weeks was assessed for each symptom weekly score and the AS. The AS 6/12-week and 9/12-week response rates (AS improvement of ≥2 points for ≥6/12- or ≥9/12-week) were also evaluated. The association of weekly AS response status (reduction of ≥30%) with weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) status (=0 and >0) was assessed. RESULTS: Among 1,372 patients (684 tenapanor [50 mg twice a day] and 688 placebo), the least squares mean change from baseline in AS was -2.66 for tenapanor vs -2.09 for placebo ( P < 0.0001). The 6/12-week AS response rate was 44.4% for tenapanor vs 32.4% for placebo ( P < 0.0001), and for 9/12-week AS, 30.6% for tenapanor vs 20.5% for placebo ( P < 0.0001). A significant association between weekly CSBM status and weekly AS response status was observed each week ( P < 0.0001), with a greater proportion achieving an AS reduction in patients with >0 CSBMs in a week. DISCUSSION: Tenapanor significantly reduced abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, particularly pain, discomfort, and bloating measured by AS, compared with placebo.

Irritable bowel syndrome - less irritable, or better treatments?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, often bothersome disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) characterized by abdominal pain associated with a change in stool frequency and/or caliber. Recent advancements have improved our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, thus opening new avenues for therapeutic intervention. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature regarding treatment modalities for IBS. RECENT FINDINGS: Altering the gut microbiome via probiotic and antibiotic administration, avoiding dietary triggers, and modulating the gut-brain axis have all proven efficacious for the management of IBS symptoms. Several gut-specific pharmacotherapies are approved for the treatment of IBS, many of which primarily address either diarrhea or constipation, although many patients remain symptomatic despite appropriate use. Brain-gut behavioral therapies (BGBTs) are increasingly used to treat symptoms of IBS, particularly in those who do not respond to traditional therapies. Virtual reality represents an exciting new approach to treating DGBIs, like IBS, though data are limited. SUMMARY: As our understanding of IBS continues to evolve, so should our therapeutic approach. Individualizing the therapeutic approach is of utmost importance.

Gastroparesis: time for a paradigm change.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroparesis (GP) is a syndrome defined by symptoms and delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Typical symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Only one medication is currently FDA-approved for the treatment of GP. This review highlights recent research findings pertaining to GP and provides evidence to support a change in the current GP diagnostic and treatment paradigm. RECENT FINDINGS: An analysis of GP trials over the past four decades demonstrates the power of placebo and the need to perform longer studies with clearly defined patient populations. Two studies highlight the need to evaluate patients with suspected GP carefully and to perform gastric emptying studies properly. The misdiagnosis of GP symptoms is reviewed, preceded by a discussion of whether GP should be considered a disorder of gut-brain interaction. Finally, new data on therapies that target the pylorus are highlighted. SUMMARY: Gastroparesis is frequently over-diagnosed and incorrectly diagnosed. Performing a proper gastric emptying study which adheres to standard protocol, and accurately interpreting the results in the context of the individual patient, are critical to making an accurate diagnosis of GP. The treatment paradigm needs to shift from simply aiming to accelerate gastric emptying to treating global symptoms of a chronic syndrome that may represent gut-brain dysfunction in many patients.

A Patient-Centered Approach to Managing IBS-C and CIC.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: At the end of the activity, participants will be able to: Implement a staged strategy for the diagnostic evaluation of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) based on history and physical examination, including the Rome IV criteria. Discuss the evidence and guideline recommendations for self-care as well as over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription therapies to treat IBS-C and CIC, Individualize treatment for IBS-C and CIC emphasizing patient-centered care to address patient concerns, improve outcomes, and enhance quality of life.

Gastroparesis: Myths, Misconceptions, and Management.

Gastroparesis (GP), a historically vexing disorder characterized by symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, early satiety, and/or bloating, in the setting of an objective delay in gastric emptying, is often difficult to treat and carries a tremendous burden on the quality of patients' lives, as well as the healthcare system in general. Though the etiology of GP has been fairly well defined, much work has been done recently to better understand the pathophysiology of GP, as well as to identify novel effective and safe treatment options. As our understanding of GP has evolved, many myths and misconceptions still abound in this rapidly changing field. The goal of this review is to identify myths and misconceptions regarding the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of GP, in the context of the latest research findings which have shaped our current understanding of GP. Recognition and dispelling of such myths and misconceptions is critical to moving the field forward and ultimately advancing the clinical management of what will hopefully become a better understood and more manageable disorder in the future.

Virtual Reality: A New Treatment Paradigm for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction?

Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), previously called functional bowel disorders, are prevalent, reduce patients' quality of life, and impose a significant negative economic impact on the health care system. Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are 2 of the most common DGBIs. An overlying, and in many cases unifying, symptom for many of these disorders is the presence of abdominal pain. Chronic abdominal pain can be difficult to treat, as many antinociceptive agents are associated with side effects that limit their use and other agents may only partially improve, but not completely relieve, all aspects of the pain. Novel therapies to alleviate chronic pain and the other symptoms that characterize DGBIs are thus needed. Virtual reality (VR), a technology that immerses patients in a multisensory experience, has been shown to relieve pain in burn victims and other instances of somatic pain. Two recent novel studies have demonstrated that VR has the potential to play an important role in the treatment of functional dyspepsia and IBS. This article examines the development of VR, its role in the treatment of somatic and visceral pain, and its potential position in the treatment of DGBIs.

Rifaximin Treatment for Individual and Multiple Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea: An Analysis Using New End Points.

PURPOSE: Rifaximin is indicated for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. The current aim was to evaluate rifaximin efficacy on individual and composite IBS-D symptoms using definitions not previously examined. METHODS: Phase III post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and the open-label phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were conducted. Adults with IBS-D received a 2-week course of rifaximin 550 mg TID. Individual and composite responses for abdominal pain (mean weekly improvements from baseline of ≥30%, ≥40%, or ≥50%), bloating (mean weekly improvements from baseline of ≥1 or ≥2 points; or ≥30%, ≥40%, or ≥50%), stool consistency (mean weekly average stool consistency score <3 or <4), and urgency (improvement from baseline of ≥30% or ≥40% in percentage of days with urgency) for ≥2 of the first 4 weeks after treatment, and weekly for 12 weeks, were assessed. FINDINGS: Overall, 1258 patients from the double-blind trials (rifaximin [n = 624]; placebo [n = 634]) and 2438 from an open-label trial were analyzed. The percentage of bloating or urgency responders was significantly greater with double-blind rifaximin versus placebo (P ≤ 0.03). A significantly greater percentage of the double-blind group were composite abdominal pain and bloating responders versus placebo for all thresholds analyzed (P < 0.05). A significantly greater percentage of the double-blind group were tri-symptom composite end point responders (abdominal pain, bloating, and fecal urgency) versus placebo (P = 0.001). A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved response (≥30% composite tri-symptom threshold) with double-blind rifaximin versus placebo as early as 1 week posttreatment, with significance maintained through ≥5 weeks after treatment. Open-label results were consistent with those of the double-blind study. IMPLICATIONS: Rifaximin significantly improved multiple, concurrent IBS-D symptoms, using clinically relevant definitions of treatment response. Using a novel tri-symptom composite end point (ie, abdominal pain, bloating, fecal urgency), adults with IBS-D treated with a 2-week course of rifaximin were significantly more likely to be composite end point responders than those receiving placebo (≥30% or ≥40% threshold) for the three symptoms. Thus, rifaximin not only met current standard thresholds used for adjudication of responders in clinical trials but also achieved higher thresholds for many of these symptoms, suggesting potential for even more robust clinical improvements. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifiers: NCT00731679, NCT00724126, and NCT01543178.

The treatment of functional dyspepsia: present and future.

INTRODUCTION: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent, but frequently overlooked and/or under diagnosed disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Functional dyspepsia frequently co-exists with other DGBIs, and persistent symptoms have a significant impact on patients' quality of life. A variety of therapies (e.g. diet, probiotics, antibiotics, acid suppressants, neuromodulators, prokinetics) are employed to treat the multiple symptoms of FD, although none are uniformly effective. AREAS COVERED: This review covers currently available therapies for the treatment of FD in addition to novel and emerging therapies that may change the treatment paradigm in the near future. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane data bank were searched from 1990 to October 2022 for relevant articles. EXPERT OPINION: Dietary intervention, eradication of H. pylori, and/or a trial of acid suppression are reasonable initial treatment options for patients with FD. Neuromodulators and fundic accommodation agents are underemployed and should be used more routinely by healthcare providers, especially for patients with moderate-severe symptoms. Alternative therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and hypnotherapy, are gaining recognition as safe and effective treatments for FD and can be used alone or in combination with medications. Virtual reality has the potential to significantly improve global FD symptoms.

Randomised clinical trial: efficacy and safety of the live biotherapeutic product MRx1234 in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: MRx1234 is a live biotherapeutic product that contains a strain of Blautia hydrogenotrophica. It is in development for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of MRx1234 in patients with IBS with predominant constipation (IBS-C) or diarrhoea (IBS-D) METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Patients aged 18-70 years in two parallel cohorts (IBS-C; IBS-D) were randomised (1:1) to MRx1234 or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall responder rate-a composite of improved bowel habit (IBS-C: stool frequency; IBS-D: stool consistency) and abdominal pain intensity-for ≥50% of the treatment period in each cohort. Statistical testing was at a one-sided 0.10 significance level. RESULTS: Of 366 randomised patients (164 IBS-C; 202 IBS-D), 365 received any study medication (177 MRx1234, 188 placebo). Numerically, although not statistically significantly different, more patients who received MRx1234 than placebo were overall responders in the IBS-C (25.0% vs. 17.1%) and IBS-D (23.4% vs. 17.8%) cohorts. Similar results were observed in the additional combined cohort analysis (24.1% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.063). For the components of the primary endpoint, significantly more patients on MRx1234 than placebo reported improvement in bowel habit in the IBS-C, IBS-D and combined cohorts, while improvements in abdominal pain were observed in each cohort. The safety profile of MRx1234 was similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: MRx1234 has the potential to become a novel, safe treatment option for patients with IBS-C or IBS-D, and for those who have mixed symptoms or transition between subtypes. CLINICALTRIALS: gov #NCT03721107.

Linaclotide Reduced Response Time for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation Symptoms: Analysis of 4 Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: These post hoc analyses provide clinically relevant data concerning time to response for individual irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) symptoms after linaclotide use. METHODS: Time-to-response data were pooled from 4 randomized controlled trials. Response time for abdominal symptoms (pain, discomfort, and bloating) and complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method; patients were categorized as early responders (≤4 weeks), late responders (>4-12 weeks), or nonresponders. RESULTS: Among 2,350 patients (1,172 placebo and 1,178 linaclotide 290 µg), >50% of patients with IBS-C who initiated linaclotide treatment experienced a decrease of ≥30% in abdominal pain, discomfort, or bloating within 3-4 weeks (median). The median time to achieving ≥3 CSBMs was 4 weeks. Although not all linaclotide-treated patients responded within 12 weeks, a late response occurred between 4 and 12 weeks in 1 in 6 patients for abdominal pain and in approximately 1 in 10 patients for CSBM frequency. Comparisons of early responders, late responders, and nonresponders for both response definitions indicated that women, Whites, and patients with less severe baseline abdominal symptoms were more likely to respond early. DISCUSSION: Although treatment responses with linaclotide occurred in >50% of patients with IBS-C within 4 weeks of treatment initiation, benefits for individual abdominal symptoms and/or CSBM frequency can still occur between 4 and 12 weeks. A lack of improvement in one symptom does not negate the possibility of response for others, highlighting the importance of discussing all symptoms with patients and not assuming treatment futility at 4 weeks.

Response and Adverse Event Rates With Placebo in Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Multiple drugs have been used to treat gastroparesis symptoms, yet their therapeutic benefits are poorly understood partly due to lack of insight into response and adverse event rates with placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We evaluated these issues systematically in drug trials for gastroparesis. METHODS: We searched the medical literature through August 2, 2022 to identify RCTs comparing active drug with placebo in patients with gastroparesis. We assessed placebo response rates according to at least one of the following endpoints: improvement according to a composite outcome, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, or fullness, as well as total adverse events, and adverse events leading to withdrawal. We extracted data as intention-to-treat analyses with dropouts assumed to be treatment failures. We pooled placebo response and adverse event rates using a random effects model and expressed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were eligible. Among 23 trials reporting a composite endpoint of improvement, the pooled placebo response rate was 29.3% (95% CI, 23.7%-35.2%). Pooled placebo response rates were higher in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (34.2% vs 28.1%), among trials that did not use validated symptom questionnaires (31.2% vs 27.4%), and in RCTs of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 32.6% vs ≥9 weeks, 23.2%). Adverse events occurred in 33.8% (95% CI, 26.4%-41.8%) of patients with placebo, in 27 trials, and were less common in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (17.9% vs 43.4%), trials of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 33.7% vs ≥9 weeks, 40.7%), and trials with lower randomization ratios of active drug to placebo (1:1, 26.7% vs 3:1, 50.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis assessed placebo response and adverse event rates in gastroparesis. To accurately assess therapeutic gain, future trials should be a minimum of 8 weeks duration, use validated questionnaires, and distinguish gastroparesis subtypes.